On October 1st, 2004, Equinox was asked,
Why was it decided to set up things up on Earth so that we procreate
and raise kids with only two people? What’s the purpose of pair
bonding and needing only two to procreate?
EQ: It was never set up to be the purpose that only two
procreated. It just happened that it only takes two. But,
if thee look historically into tribal customs, is it two? It is
never two. It is always the unity of the group. It just so
happened that the merging of one sperm and one egg created one
entity. But dost thou even know that in tribal periods, they did
not even realize the two connected, that the interaction of the penis
with the vagina created this entity. They believed it was the
celebration that they did in other ways that created this. And
so, it was a total sharing. What happened was, entities became
selfish and controlling, possessive and power-hungry. And it is
much easier for little minds to control one other being or two other
beings than to control the whole tribe of beings. Is this not
so? Traditionally, marriage was created in order for the church
to be able to control the monies. It was also created in order to
keep the kings, the queens, those entities who wanted power to keep a
continuous line of power. Dost thou understand? Dost thou
A continuous line?
EQ: A line of power. If one male and one female procreate
and create a third entity, that third entity is a direct line. Is
this not so?
EQ: Imagine then, instead, three or four males and six females
procreate. What’s the direct line? No one knows who did
what and when. So this also created pair bonding. From that
came the illusion of loving. That somehow two entities could
fulfill within each other enough that they could forget their
connection to the Source. And the more these entities believed
this, the more confused the planet became, did it not? The more
entities fought for things outside themselves instead of sharing, is
this not so? If thee look at the violence upon thy planet, thee
will see a direct connection to pair bonding, because then it becomes
ownership and possessions, monies and land, all the same thing.
Dost thou understand? And then it becomes “our” children, as
though thy little ones are thy possessions to do what ever thee want
with, with no regard that there be an advanced soul inhabiting this
with agendas of its own. Is this not so? And look at what
that has caused. It is no longer a nurturing of what is, it is no
longer a nurturing of that seed to see it flower. Is mom and dad
taking a tulip and trying to create an iris. Dost thou understand?
Moving to what they want.
EQ: Yes, instead of letting the tulip be beauteous in its own
© 2004 Myama, Inc.